Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Powe
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
This is. an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act for causing the death of Marshall, the respondent’s deceased. It has been before the Court after an earlier trial, Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Tyner, 278 U. S. 565, and now is brought here again to review a judgment of the Supreme Court of South Carolina affirming a judgment for the plaintiff. 159 S. E. 473. The petitioner contends that it was entitled to have a verdict directed in its favor on the grounds that there was no evidence that it was negligent and that Marshall must be taken to have assumed the risk of the supposed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BerkshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. LeitchSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. TynerSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Powe v. A.C.L.R. R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
3Cited by52 opinions
- House v. MayoSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hall v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
- Green v. ObergfellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Clyde Flowers v. The Travelers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.