Fredericks v. Fort Dodge Brick & Tile Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Webster District Court. — Hon. Chas. E. Albrook, Judge. Action for damages resulted in judgment against defendant from which it appeals.^
1Per curiam
The defendant is a corporation engaged in the manufacture of hrick and tile and procures the material therefor from a pit or excavation near by. The material is shoveled into wheelbarrows which are wheeled to a platform and dumped into cars, on which it is hauled where needed. Five to eight men were employed in shoveling, and others, by blasting and the use of picks, bars, or shovels, loosened the clay from the bank. This bank was fifty or sixty feet high, and plaintiff who had been employed as a sho.veler about a year and a half, on July 3, 1908, while shoveling clay on his wheelbarrow at…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pantzar v. . Tilly Foster Iron Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Illinois Steel Co. v. SchymanowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Bradley v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Naylor v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Griffin v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnson v. Corn Products Refining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Garren v. Ottumwa Gas Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919