Legal Opinion

Garren v. Ottumwa Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 17, 1919Published

Appeal from Wapello District Ooiort. — C. W. Vermilion, Judge. Action for damages for alleged negligence. There was a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

1. Master and servant : hidden and lurking dangers. 1. Plaintiff alleges, substantially, that, on November 17, 1913, he was an employee of defendant’s, engaged as a laborer in digging ditches and doing work outside of defendant’s plant; that, in the manufacture of gas, defendant used a metallic boiler, or tar receptacle, about 10 feet long and 3 feet in diameter, sitting upon end upon a cement foundation about 3 feet high; that the fop on said boiler or tar tank was merely a lid, calked around the edges, with no rivets to hold the same on, and that said tar head ivas not securely fastened to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Beresford v. American Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Vohs v. A. E. Shorthill & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Hendrickson v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API