Legal Opinion

United States v. Ambort

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 24, 2002No. Nos. 01-4077, 01-4078, 01-4079PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

This matter is before us on interlocutory appeal for the second time in an attempt by Defendants Appellants (“Defendants”) to avoid trial on various charges alleging violation of federal tax laws.1 Relying principally on United States v. P.H.E., Inc., 965 F.2d 848 (10th Cir.1992), Defendants assert that they have a First Amendment “right not to be tried.” Specifically, they contend that the government is waging a vindictive prosecution against them, motivated by a desire to chill their First Amendment rights.

We rejected the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. P.H.E., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Honorable Jim R. Carrigan, and Peter Kiewit Sons' Company, Harold L. Cherry, and Richard L. McVaney Parties in Interest-RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. AmbortCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. AmbortCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Ambort v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. Ambort v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Benson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API