Legal Opinion

Brenzinger v. Thornburgh

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 5, 1923No. 1537PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMYTH, Chief Justice.

In an interference proceeding between Julius Brenzinger and Ivan D. Thornburgh, the Commissioner of Patents decided in favor of Thornburgh.

It appears that, in packing perishable products in tin cans closed and sealed by the double-seaming process, it has been found necessary to interpose a suitable packing between the layers of metal which are intercurled and compressed to form the douhle seam, in order to insure an air-tight joint. The invention in controversy relates to improvements in paper-lining machines for the covers of such cans. There were five counts in the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Braren v. HornerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  2. Collins v. LotzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
  3. Swain v. BoothDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API