State v. Tierinni
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
The defendant, Christopher Tieri-nni, appeals from the judgment of the trial court revoking his probation. The defendant claims that (1) his plea and waiver of his right to a hearing are unenforceable because they were made involuntarily, unknowingly and unintelligently, (2) the condition of his probation that prohibited him from having any contact with minors was unconstitutionally restrictive, vague and overbroad, and (3) the prosecutor improperly “made [her] self a witness” at the dispositional hearing. We do *234not agree that the defendant’s plea was unenforceable and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. BrittonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- State v. OrtizConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- State v. FrancisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Guiliano v. Jefferson Radiology, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- State v. AbramovichConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
- State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021