Legal Opinion

Village of Kirtland Hills v. Fuhrman, 2007-L-151 (5-2-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 2008No. 2007-L-151PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Appellant, Matthew D. Fuhrman, appeals the judgment of the Willoughby Municipal Court denying his motion to suppress. For the reasons set forth below, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

{¶ 2} Fuhrman was charged in the Willoughby Municipal Court with one count of operation of a motor vehicle after underage consumption, in violation of R.C. 4511.19(B)(3), one count of driving without complying with reinstatement requirements, in violation of Kirtland Hills Ordinance 335.073(a), and one count of speeding, in violation of Kirtland Hills Ordinance 333.03.

{¶ 3} On June 6,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. RetherfordOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. MedcalfOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. LopezOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. State v. ReynoldsOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. State v. RussoOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. 2022-L-092, 2022-L-095Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. State v. EnglerOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API