Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 9, 1993No. 5-91-0187Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maag

The defendant, Frank J. Smith, pleaded guilty to burglary in two separate cases and to felony theft in a third case.

On appeal, he only contends that he must be allowed to file a new motion, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 604(d) (134 Ill. 2d R. 604(d)), to withdraw his guilty pleas, because defense counsel did not comply with the spirit and purpose of Rule 604(d) and because defendant was not furnished with a copy of the guilty plea transcript in accordance with Rule 604(d).

In St. Clair County No. 89 — CF—890, defendant was charged with burglary. On December 14, 1989, he pleaded guilty to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. WilkIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. HayesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. People v. MabryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API