Legal Opinion

Brannock v. Bromley

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 1939No. Civ. 5946PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTuttle, J.

This is an action brought by Nellie Brannock and her husband, Weldon Brannoek, arising out of an automobile accident in which the wife, a pedestrian, was admittedly struck by an automobile driven by defendant, Tirzah Bromley, and belonging to defendant Bromley. The jury brought in a verdict somewhat unusual in form, which reads as follows:

“We, the jury in the above entitled cause, find for the defendants, William Bromley and Tirzah Bromley, and against the plaintiffs, Nellie Bromley and Weldon Bromley, her husband.
“We, the jury, find that both the plaintiffs and defendants were guilty of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gett v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Heintz v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Stoakes v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Flach v. FikesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Gaston v. Hisashi TsurudaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Watkins v. NuttingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Dankert v. Lamb Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Levi v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. People v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Woods v. EitzeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API