Goliday v. State

DICKSON, Justice.

Defendant Robert Goliday was found guilty of burglary and theft, and was determined to be a habitual offender. He appeals claiming error related to: 1) admission of testimony of prior uncharged burglaries, 2) refusal of tendered instruction, 3) admission of State's Exhibit 32, and 4) sufficiency of the evidence for the habitual offender determination.

As its first argument, appellant's brief claims that the trial court erred in allowing evidence of unrelated prior crimes. However, the brief makes only general references to "evidence of prior uncharged burglaries" and fails to…