Legal Opinion

Tadlock Painting Co. v. Maryland Cas. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 15, 1996No. 24465PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

473 S.E.2d 52 (1996)

TADLOCK PAINTING COMPANY, Plaintiff/Appellee,

v.

MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 24465.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Heard April 17, 1996.

Decided July 15, 1996.

C. Mitchell Brown and William C. Wood, Jr., of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, Columbia; Hugh L. Willcox, Jr., of Willcox, McLeod, Buyck & Williams, Florence; and E. Charles Dann, Jr., of Goodell, Devries, Leech & Gray, Baltimore, Maryland, for defendant-appellant.

John L. Schurlknight, Florence, for plaintiff-appellee.

WALLER, Justice:

The following question has been certified to this Court from…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  4. White v. Unigard Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Pitts v. Jackson National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Williams v. RiedmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Peterson Ex Rel. Walker v. West American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Doe v. South Carolina Medical Malpractice Liability Joint Underwriting Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. Gaskins v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API