Legal Opinion

Matter of Bock

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 26, 1992PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

This attorney discipline matter arises from a Report and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months. Three members of the DRB disagreed and concluded that a public reprimand, coupled with a requirement of certain supervisory practices, would constitute sufficient punishment. The majority recommendation is based on findings of the District X Ethics Committee, concurred in by the DRB, that respondent had engaged in unethical conduct in violation of RPC 8.4(c) and (d), conduct involving dishonesty,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re MatteraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Application of MatthewsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. In Re InfinitoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  4. In Re JacobSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Matter of YaccarinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Matter of GreenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  3. Matter of MagidSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Matter of HowardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  5. In Re MeadenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API