Moss v. Stockdale, Peckham & Werner
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (C. S.), P. J.
Introduction
In this action by plaintiff and appellant Colleen Janelle Moss for legal malpractice, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant and respondent Stockdale, Peckham & Werner, on the ground the action is barred by the statute of limitations, Code of Civil Procedure section 340.6. The matter has been retransferred to us by the California Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of Adams v. Paul (1995) 11 Cal.4th 583 [46 Cal.Rptr.2d 594, 904 P.2d 1205] (hereafter Adams). We reverse the summary judgment, because under Adams there are…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Adams v. PaulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Fox v. PollackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Carroll v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hillbroom v. Pricewaterhousecoopers LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Sanchez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- De Santiago v. D AND G PLUMBING, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Jordan v. SUPERSTAR SANDCARSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- (HC) Cisneros v. MattesonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021