Legal Opinion

Malis v. LIEBERMAN

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1970No. Appeal, 350PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell,

Appellants filed preliminary objections to appellees’ complaint in Equity, which were dismissed by the lower Court.

This appeal has been taken under the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, 12 P.S. §672, challenging the lower Court’s jurisdiction of the subject matter. The appeal must be quashed as having been taken too late.

The Act of 1925, supra, Section 3, provides: “The appeal here provided for must be taken and perfected * within fifteen days from the date when the decision is rendered; . . .” This requirement is mandatory in all cases and admits of no…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fenerty Disbarment CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Burdett Oxygen Co. v. I. R. Wolfe & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Reynolds Metals Co. v. BergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Luzerne CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Schwartz v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Iannotta v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Foltz v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Erie Redevelopment Authority v. PulakosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Alger-Rau & Associates, Inc. v. General State AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Riverside Memorial Mausoleum v. UMET Trust, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API