Legal Opinion

George v. Jernigan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 9, 1978No. 77-119PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

Arkmo Lumber & Supply Company brought suit against the petitioners to enforce a materialman’s lien. The petitioners appeared specially and moved to quash the service on the ground that the summons merely directed them to answer the plaintiff’s complaint within 20 days, without further warning them, in the language of the statute, that they were required to answer “under the penalty of the complaint being taken for confessed.” Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-306 (Repl. 1962). Upon the trial court’s overruling the motion to quash service, the petitioners sought a writ of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. DeSoto Inc. v. CrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Ford Life Insurance v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API