Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Rounds

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1944No. Appeals, 48-51PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Maxey,

This is an appeal from the granting of a new trial because of the inadequacy of the verdict for $100 for the husband-plaintiff. Mrs. Taylor was a passenger in a car driven by Samuel E. Sweet, which came into violent collision with defendant’s motor bus at a street intersection in Erie. The case was clearly one for the jury, as we decided in the opinion this day filed in the case of Sweet v. Rounds, 349 Pa. 152. The decision in that case controls this case for the attorneys for the defendants filed a stipulation that if this court decided that “the evidence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Donoghue v. Consolidated Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Sweet v. RoundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Todd v. BerciniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Nikisher v. BenningerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Nunamaker v. New Alexandria Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Liebendofer v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Lutz v. ForceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API