Legal Opinion

Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 5, 2009No. 07-5040PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

The sole issue raised in this rehearing en banc is whether § 704(a) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a), creates a cause of action for third-party retaliation for persons who have not personally engaged in protected activity. After applying the plain and unambiguous statutory text, we join the Third, Fifth, and Eighth Circuit Courts of Appeal in holding that the authorized class of claimants is limited to persons who have personally engaged in protected activity by opposing a practice, making a charge, or assisting or…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Wysocki v. International Business MacHine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. J. DeMasters v. Carilion ClinicCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  3. Longaberger Co. v. KoltCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. Terry v. Tyson Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Asher v. Unarco Material Handling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API