Legal Opinion

Fajardo Sugar Growers Ass'n v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 26, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, District Judge.

This action was brought to recover excise taxes alleged to have been illegally assessed against plaintiff under the Sugar Act of 1937, 7 U.S.C.A., §§ 1100-1183. Defendant moves, before answer, for an order granting summary judgment in its favor, or, in the alternative, dismissing the complaint, upon the ground of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter inasmuch as plaintiff’s second claim for refund is a duplicate of its prior claim, suit upon which is barred by limitation. 26 U.S.C.A.Int. Rev.Code, § 3772(a) (2).

Plaintiff paid the assessments complained of,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hills v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  2. B. Altman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  3. 18th Street Leader Stores, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  4. Pacific Mills v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934
  5. Einson-Freeman Co. v. CorwinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fajardo Sugar Growers Ass'n v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  2. Harvard Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API