Legal Opinion

Einson-Freeman Co. v. Corwin

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 17, 1940No. 338PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, Circuit Judge.

The question is whether a taxpayer whose claim for refund has been rejected may extend the time fixed by statute for commencement of action by filing a second claim for refund on one of the grounds asserted in the first claim.

The Revenue Act of 1932, section 609, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 612, imposed a tax on games, except children’s games. The Treasury Department made a regulation that jig saw puzzles were games, with a proviso that puzzles containing 50 pieces or less were children’s games and so not taxable. The plaintiff, a manufacturer of jig saw puzzles,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cooley v. . LobdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. White v. AronsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Pacific Mills v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. A. H. Kelson and Nyla C. Kelson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  2. Ned Miller and Frances Miller v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. Southeast Bank of Orlando v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  4. 18th Street Leader Stores, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  5. Worthington Pump & Machinery Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API