In re Estate of Rudy
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 366, Jan. T., 1897, by Samuel M. Hudson, from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., Jan. T., 1897, No. 168, on petition for sale of real estate. Petition of Samuel M. Hudson, the husband of Sarah K. Hudson, née Rudy, for sale of real estate.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 366, Jan. T., 1897, by Samuel M. Hudson, from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., Jan. T., 1897, No. 168, on petition for sale of real estate. Petition of Samuel M. Hudson, the husband of Sarah K. Hudson, née Rudy, for sale of real estate. The facts appear by the opinion of Ashman, J., dismissing tbe petition which was as follows : The testator gave to his wife tbe income for life of bis residuary estate, and at her death he authorized and empowered his executors to sell the residuary realty and to divide the proceeds of its sale equally between his two children, Sarah K. and George W.…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We find no error in the decree from which this appeal was taken. The questions involved were fully considered and correctly disposed of by the court below; and for reasons given in its opinion the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.
2Cited by16 opinions
- Henry v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
- Raleigh's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Reed's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Bair's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Painter v. PainterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.