Legal Opinion

Painter v. Painter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1908No. Appeal, No. 179PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal, No. 179, Oct., T., 1906, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Butler Co., Dec. T., 1905, No. 72, dismissing bill in equity in case of Thomas Painter, E. H. Painter, Milton B. Painter, Delilah Duffy and Melvina Gill v. Peter Painter (with notice to J. L. M. Halstead, Miss M. L. Buckley and H. L. Buckley). Bill in equity for partition. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was decree dismissing the bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Mestrezat,

This is a bill filed in the court below for the partition of 120 acres of land and the undivided one-seventh interest in another tract of sixty acres situate in Buffalo township, Butler county. George W. Painter died seized of the land on May 22, 1899, leaving to survive him a widow, Mary E., and two daughters, Minnie R. and Helen M., and, as brothers and sisters, the plaintiffs and Peter Painter, the defendant in the bill. By his last will, George W. Painter directed an appraisement and sale of his personal property and the application of the proceeds to his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Craig v. LeslieSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  2. Read v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Lorillard v. CosterNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
  4. Morrow ex rel. Isett v. BrenizerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1828
  5. In re Estate of RudySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re Estate of SanfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. Wagner v. ClausonIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Thompson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Reed's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Anderson v. GiftMississippi Supreme Court · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API