Legal Opinion

Ringler v. Ringler

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 17, 1929No. [No. 53, October Term, 1928.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOffutt, J.

The question raised by this appeal is a narrow one. On. April 10th, 1914, Sylvester K. Ringler of Cumberland, Maryland, became a member of the relief department of the Baltimore and Ohio- Railroad Company, which was organized and maintained for the purpose of providing benefit insurance for such of its employees as became members of the relief department. He was twice married and bad two* children by his first wife, Thomas Ringler and Ruth R. Kempf, the appellants in this case, and five children by his second wife. In bis application for insurance he designated as beneficiaries bis wife Ida…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Freund v. FreundIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Supreme Conclave v. CappellaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1890
  3. Nally v. NallySupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  4. New York Life Insurance v. FlackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1852
  5. Berg v. DamkoehlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Urquhart v. Alexander & Alexander, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. Carson v. CarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Harjo v. FoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. The MacCabees v. LippsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API