Legal Opinion
Bloodgood v. Bloodgood
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 12, 1997No. 53A04-9608-CV-348PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Respondent-Appellant Thomas C. Blood-good III appeals the trial court’s division of marital property and order to pay attorney fees in a dissolution action filed by Petitioner-Appellee Patsy A. Bloodgood.
We affirm.
ISSUES
Thomas raises two issues for our review, which we restate as:
1. Whether the trial court erred in equally dividing the marital property.
2. Whether the trial court erred in ordering Thomas to pay a portion of Patsy’s attorney fees.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Thomas and Patsy were married on November 14,1959, and separated on March 29,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scott v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Marriage of McBride v. McBrideIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Marriage of R.E.G. v. L.M.G.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Reese v. ReeseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Marriage of Hodowal v. HodowalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bertholet v. BertholetIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Sallee v. MasonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- In re Marriage of BartleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Eye v. EyeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Williamson v. WilliamsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.