Legal Opinion
Marriage of Hodowal v. Hodowal
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 31, 1994No. 06A01-9306-CV-207PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
We are asked to decide whether an early retirement subsidy is marital property subject to division under our Dissolution of Marriage Act. Petitioner, John R. Hodowal ("Husband"), appeals from a Decree of Marriage Dissolution ("Decree") and Qualified Domestic Relations Order ("QDRO") awarding the Respondent, Virginia Hodowal ("Wife"), a part of Husband's subsidized early retirement benefits if he qualifies and retires before the normal retirement age. The trial court awarded Wife seventy-five percent (75%) of the current value of Husband's retirement plans,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marriage of Myers v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Marriage of Eyler v. EylerIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Kirkman v. KirkmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re the Marriage of AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Marriage of R.E.G. v. L.M.G.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re Marriage of BartleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Bloodgood v. BloodgoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Coffey v. CoffeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Benny Harris v. Tonya Harris (n/k/a Keith)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Harvey v. HarveyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.