Solis v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REEVES, Justice.
The appellant was convicted of driving while intoxicated by a jury and sentenced to two years probation and a $300.00 fine. He raises two points of error: (1) the information under which he was prosecuted was defective; and (2) the information should have been quashed since it failed to specify whether he was intoxicated by loss of faculties or by an alcohol concentration of 0.10 *874or more. The appellant’s second point of error has merit, and we reverse and remand.
In his first point of error, the appellant argues that the information under which he was charged was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Forte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Gorman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Wells v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Gibbons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Solis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Ray v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
- Murk v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Gowin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1988
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.