Legal Opinion
Riemers v. Super Target of Grand Forks, Target Corp.
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided March 8, 2005No. Civil File A2-04-106PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ERICKSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (doc. # 8). Plaintiff has filed a brief in opposition (doc. # 11). Defendant has filed a reply brief (doc. # 12). This decision follows.
I.SUMMARY OF HOLDING
This Court finds that Plaintiff is not entitled to exercise his federal First Amendment rights nor his state free expression rights on Defendant’s private property. Therefore the Court grants Defendant summary judgment as to all federal and state claims.
II. BACKGROUND
There are no…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Charles Richard Stone v. Rick Harry Anita Schlank Deborah Konieska Rhonda Heskin Amy Anderson Lori Parkos Jim LindCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.