Legal Opinion

Corey v. Sunburst Oil & Gas Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1925No. 5,589PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

The plaintiff, while a homesteader upon government land, and before he made the final proof which is required as preliminary to the issuance of patent, executed an oil and gas lease to a predecessor in interest of the defendant. Patent was issued February 27, 1922, In May, 1923, plaintiff began suit against the defendant to quiet title to the land, his purpose being to rid the land of the lease; this upon the theory that the lease is void under both federal and state statutes.

The defendant corporation by answer admits reliance upon the lease. It alleges affirmatively in substance that during…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Glass v. Basin & Bay State Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Power v. GumMontana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Hartman v. Butterfield Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Gazette Printing Co. v. McConnellMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Solberg v. Sunburst Oil & Gas Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Homestake Exploration Corp. v. SchoreggeMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Nadeau v. Texas CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. McNamer Realty Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Gas Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Elliott v. Pure Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Burgess v. LasbyMontana Supreme Court · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API