Legal Opinion

Matter of Andersen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1978No. 12891PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

The controversy and resultant district court judgment which we review today centers around an infant boy whose parents under adverse conditions decided to give the baby — then 4 weeks old — for adoption, and then changed their minds shortly after-wards and prior to the institution of any adoption proceedings. The infant’s parents, in placing him with the proposed adoptive parents, each signed a consent to adoption which was not filed with the adoption court until over 6 weeks later, and only after an attorney for the parents had notified the adopting parents that the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Furgeson v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  5. People ex rel. Scarpetta v. Spence-Chapin Adoption ServiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1971

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Revello v. RevelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. S. O. v. W. S.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Petition of SOSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  4. In Matter of Petition of Steve B.D. v. Steve B.D.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. F.E. v. G.F.M.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API