Legal Opinion

Federal Trade Commission v. Austin (In Re Austin)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 7, 1992No. 19-05361PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAVID H. COAR, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court, having considered the memoranda of law and affidavits submitted by the parties, now rules as follows.

FINDINGS OF FACT

The Defendant in this adversary proceeding, Donald S. Austin [Austin], is the founder, president, and sole shareholder of several corporations [Austin corporations] which operate a chain of art galleries in Illinois, California, and Michigan. In this capacity, Austin is responsible for developing and implementing corporate policies for…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Robert Sheridan, Debtor-Appellee. Appeal of City National Bank of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Banner Oil Co. v. Bryson (In Re Bryson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  3. Fezler v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. Green v. Pawlinski (In Re Pawlinski)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  5. Union National Bank of Marseilles v. Leigh (In Re Leigh)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API