Legal Opinion

United States v. Harry Hargrove

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 12, 2012No. 11-4818PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHEDD, Circuit Judge:

Based on his involvement in dogfighting activity, Harry Louis Hargrove was convicted of violating one provision of the Animal Welfare Act, 7 U.S.C. § 2156. He now appeals his 60-month sentence. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

I

The government describes Hargrove as being a “legend” in the dogfighting community. By Hargrove’s own admission, he has been involved in dogfighting activity for over four decades, and at one time he had approximately 250 fighting dogs on his property. Information in the record shows that offspring from one of Hargrove’s fighting dogs,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. United States v. Erasto Gomez-JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Dennis HowardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. Dominic McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Robert CissonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  5. United States v. German VenturaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API