Legal Opinion

Rose v. City of Tulsa

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 18, 2005No. 99,501PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LARRY JOPLIN, Presiding Judge:

¶ 1 Defendant City of Tulsa, a municipal corporation (“City”) seeks review of the trial court’s order granting a directed verdict for Plaintiff/Appellee Sonja Dee Rose (“Rose”) on the issue of liability regarding Rose’s action to recover damages sustained in a rear-end car wreck. City complains that the trial court (1) improperly withheld the issue of negligence from the jury; (2) erred in refusing to instruct the jury on “unavoidable accident” and (3) erred in not instructing the jury on sovereign immunity under the Governmental Tort Claims Act.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Computer Publications, Inc. v. WeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. Newport v. USAASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. Huey v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Ankney v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. Athey v. BinghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Graybeal v. Martin Sand & GravelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API