Rose v. City of Tulsa
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LARRY JOPLIN, Presiding Judge:
¶ 1 Defendant City of Tulsa, a municipal corporation (“City”) seeks review of the trial court’s order granting a directed verdict for Plaintiff/Appellee Sonja Dee Rose (“Rose”) on the issue of liability regarding Rose’s action to recover damages sustained in a rear-end car wreck. City complains that the trial court (1) improperly withheld the issue of negligence from the jury; (2) erred in refusing to instruct the jury on “unavoidable accident” and (3) erred in not instructing the jury on sovereign immunity under the Governmental Tort Claims Act.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Computer Publications, Inc. v. WeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Newport v. USAASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Huey v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Ankney v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Athey v. BinghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Graybeal v. Martin Sand & GravelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007