Legal Opinion

Nieves v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 23, 2011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court correctly granted that branch of the motion of the defendant, City of New York, which was pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the jury verdict on the issue of liability and for judgment as a matter of law. It is not disputed that the City did not receive prior written notice of the alleged defective condition in the roadway (see Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-201 [c] [2]) and, thus, the plaintiff sought to establish the City’s liability under the affirmative negligence exception to that rule for work performed by the City which immediately results in the existence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Szczerbiak v. PilatNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Mirand v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Yarborough v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Oboler v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Laracuente v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Laracuente v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API