Legal Opinion

BOSCHERT MERRIFIELD CONS. v. Masonite Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 24, 2004No. 1031061PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Boschert Merrifield Consultants, Inc. ("Boschert"), filed a notice of appeal from an order denying Boschert's motions to vacate and stay two interlocutory orders of a special master appointed to oversee the administration and enforcement of a class-action settlement agreement. We dismiss the appeal.

The underlying dispute began in December 1994, when Judy Naef filed a class action ("the Naef case") against Masonite Corporation and International Paper Company (hereinafter referred to collectively as "Masonite"). Ex parte Masonite Corp.,681 So.2d 1068, 1069 (Ala. 1996).1 The complaint alleged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Triple J Cattle, Inc. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Mars Hill Ch. of Anniston, Alabama, Inc. v. Missionary BaptistSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Ex Parte Masonite Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  4. Daughtry v. MOBILE CTY. SHERIFF'S DEPT.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hamm v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  2. B.V. v. Macon County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  3. McCollum v. KeatingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  4. Bv v. MacOn County DhrCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  5. Enslen v. Alabama Department of TransportationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API