Legal Opinion

Heimerdinger v. Schnitzler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 6, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

Defendant appeals, by permission, from a determination of the Appellate Term reversing a judgment dismissing the complaint and ordering judgment for plaintiffs.

On June 17, 1929, the defendant purchased from plaintiffs, dealers in unlisted securities, some Mexican bonds, to be paid for on delivery. The sale was confirmed by a letter of the plaintiffs dated June 17, 1929, reading: “ We herewith beg to confirm having sold to you today pesos 20,000 Mexican Silver 5’s at 7 3/8 net, sellers sixty days.” Thereafter no further communications were had between the parties until December 2, 1929, when…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rickerson v. . Hartford Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Sistare v. . BestNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Hart v. CortAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WinslowNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Flag Realty Co. v. PisciottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Kraus v. Chatham Phenix National Bank & Trust Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1932
  4. American Molasses Co. v. RobertsonNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Duffield & Co. v. EllsworthNew York Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API