Legal Opinion

State v. Hebert

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 12, 1923No. 26165PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, C. J.

Appellant was convicted of manufacturing intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes, and was sentenced to pay a fine and be imprisoned. The record contains eight bills of exception, presenting seven complaints.

The first complaint is that the district judge overruled appellant’s plea to the jurisdiction of the court, based upon the fact that he had been indicted by the federal grand jury for a violation of the Volstead Act (U. S. Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138% et seq.) in the same alleged transaction for which he was indicted and was about to be put on trial for violation of the Hood Law…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. State v. JumelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858
  3. State v. AuthementSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  4. State ex rel. Courrege v. FisherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  5. State v. VossSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. State v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  3. State v. FloraneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  4. State v. BreauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  5. State v. CarlanderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API