Legal Opinion
State v. Florane
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 26, 1934No. 32689PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ODOM, Justice.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of keeping a banking game at which money was bet or hazarded, in violation of Act No. 12 of 1870. He was fined $1,000, and, in default of the payment of the fine, it was ordered that he serve six months in jail. He appealed.
He moved to quash the indictment on two grounds: First, that Act No. 12 of 1870, under which the indictment is brought, is unconstitutional ; and, second, that said act was repealed by articles 341, 582, and 583 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
As to the constitutionality of the act, it need only be said that the act…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State v. CapaciSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- State v. RodostaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- State v. BussaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- State v. DaleoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- State v. HimelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- State v. DidierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.