Legal Opinion
In re the Guardianship of A. O.
New York City Family Court
Decided January 13, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard N. Ross, J.
In these proceedings filed pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, petitioners New York Foundling Hospital (subject child A. O.) and Pious XII Youth and Family Services (subject *178children C. G. O. and A. C.) seek an order permitting the fact-finding hearing to occur without the personal appearance of the respondent putative father, who is incarcerated in Connecticut. State of Connecticut corrections officials are refusing to produce the respondent putative father in New York for the hearing. Unless he is paroled, he is expected to be incarcerated until…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In re Nicole V.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- In re Michael B.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Interest of FHNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matter of Adoption of JSPLNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- In re James Carton K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Daryl v. BoydDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- M.L.L. v. WessmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995