Legal Opinion

Hall v. Cummings

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 5, 1923No. 10,304PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

This was mandamus to the clerk and recorder of Washington county. A demurrer to the alternative writ was sustained and the relators bring error.

The relators and others presented to the respondent a petition for the recall of one Buckmaster as county commissioner. The clerk refused to accept it. Mandamus was brought. On demurrer sustained as above the writ was discharged.

The ground relied on in this court to support the judgment is that the county commissioner is a county officer and that county officers cannot be recalled under the so-*75called recall amendment, article XXI of the Constitution,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BradleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  2. Dixon v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  3. People v. HigginsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
  4. Guyer v. StuttSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  5. Chambers v. People ex rel. StorerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bernzen v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  2. Groditsky v. PinckneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. Miller v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Bernzen v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  5. No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API