Legal Opinion

Reeves Cedarhurst Dev. v. FIRST AMFED

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 30, 1992No. 1911376PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Reeves Cedarhurst Development Corporation ("RCDC"), appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the defendants, First Amfed Corporation; First Services Corporation of Huntsville, Inc. ("FSC"); and First American Federal Savings and Loan Association ("FAFSL"), in a breach of contract action. We affirm.

FSC and FAFSL are wholly owned subsidiaries of First Amfed, a savings and loan holding company. This suit concerns a "Purchase/Option Agreement" between FSC and RCDC, executed on April 18, 1989. Under this agreement, FSC granted RCDC an option to purchase real estate owned by FSC…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Wilson v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Southern Medical Health Systems, Inc. v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  2. Beazer East, Inc. v. The Mead CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Wayne J. Griffin Elec. v. Dunn Const.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Nationwide Ins. Co. v. NilsenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Bowdoin Square, LLC v. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API