Legal Opinion

Thornbrugh v. Poulin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 1984No. 13233PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENE, Judge.

Berniece, Robert and Maxine Thorn-brugh sued defendants Poulin and Ozark Concrete Company (Ozark) in a five-count petition, seeking an injunction to prevent defendants from interfering with the use of plaintiffs’ property by the operation of a rock quarry, and seeking actual and punitive damages for damage to their property and interference with its use. The Thorn-brughs requested a jury trial on the damage issues, which request was denied. After trial by court, findings of fact, conclusions of law and a judgment were filed.

In its findings of fact, the trial court found as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Trenton Trust Co. v. Western Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. Craig v. Jo B. Gardner, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  4. Prueliage v. De Seaton CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  5. Wente v. ShaverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1997
  2. Meyer v. LofgrenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Williams Carver Co. v. Poos Bros., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Boshers v. Humane Society of Missouri, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Baum v. Glen Park PropertiesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API