Williams v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence without further comment, but remand for the trial court to correct the probation revocation order to specify the condition of probation violated by Appellant. See Leggs v. State, 27 So.3d 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). Appellant need not be present. See Baldwin v. State, 855 So.2d 1180 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.
VAN NORTWICK, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Leggs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Baldwin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- Naim Stewart v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Stewart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Stewart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019