Legal Opinion
ARGEN v. KATZ
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 5, 2023No. 2:18-cv-00963Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY PAUL ARGEN and SURENDER MALHAN, Civil Action No: 18-963(SDW)(LDW) Plaintiffs, OPINION v. DAVID KATZ, June 5, 2023 Defendant. WIGENTON, District Judge. Before this Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 56. Jurisdiction is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391. This opinion is issued without oral argument pursuant to Rule 78. For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.