Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1949No. 32550PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Special ground 5 of the amended motion for a new trial contends that the trial court erred in making a prejudicial and improper remark in the presence of the jury during the progress of the trial. The remark grew out of a colloquy between counsel for the defendant and the court over the admissibility of certain evidence. Counsel for the defendant had just stated that the defense expected to show that Eddie Wilson (the deceased) came to the house where his wife, Dorothy, lived; that the proposed witness, who also lived there, opened the door for him and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pulliam v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Potter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Loeb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  4. Palmer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Oglesby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Parks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  2. Shanks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  3. Beam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  4. Bramlett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API