Legal Opinion

United States v. Simon

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided May 25, 1909No. 3PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, Circuit Judge.

The United States filed a petition to vacate the respondent’s naturalization, upon the ground that it w-as illegally procured, in that Simon “had not resided continuously in the United States for a period of five years immediately preceding the date of his petition for citizenship.”

From the agreed statement of facts, it appeared that Simon, being a Russian, came to Canada in August, 1890, and there remained until January 26, 1896, when he “migrated” to New York. On June, 1896, “he returned to Canada for the purpose of closing up some business interests that he had left…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. GleesonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  2. Pintsch Compressing Co. v. BerginU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1897

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. CantiniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
  2. United States v. KuscheDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1944
  3. United States v. SpohrerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1910
  4. United States v. AakervikDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1910
  5. United States v. WexlerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1925

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API