Legal Opinion

Howell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 16, 1994No. F-88-1045Published

1Opinion of the Court

882 P.2d 1086 (1994)

Michael Wayne HOWELL, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-88-1045.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

September 16, 1994.

Rehearing Denied November 1, 1994.

Robert Macy, Dist. Atty., Ray Elliott, Asst. Dist. Atty., Oklahoma City, at trial for State.

Tim Wilson, Paul Faulk, Public Defender's Office, Oklahoma City, at trial for defendant.

Chris Box, Oklahoma City, at trial for co-defendant.

David Autry, Asst. Public Defender, Oklahoma City, on appeal, for appellant.

Robert H. Henry, Atty. Gen., A. Diane Hammons, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, on appeal, for appellee.

O…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API