Mayfield v. State

HOLCOMB, Justice.

A jury convicted Appellant of engaging in organized criminal activity and sentenced him to 32 years in prison. Appellant assigns six points of error. In his first two points, Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. In the next four points, Appellant contends that the court erred when it: (1) refused to instruct the jury on accomplice testimony; (2) failed to quash his indictment; (3) admitted into evidence the acts of co-defendants; and (4) failed to quash the jury, which permitted the State to use its strikes in a discriminatory…