Legal Opinion

Braden v. Jim Bishop Chevrolet, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 24, 2004No. 1021829PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal is from a summary judgment; we affirm.

On January 30, 2002, Jim Bishop Chevrolet, Inc., doing business as Jim Bishop Toyota ("Bishop"), sued Andy Braden in the Colbert Circuit Court, alleging fraud, breach of contract, detinue, conversion, and misrepresentation. Braden responded with a motion to dismiss, which was denied by the trial court; Braden then filed an answer, which he subsequently amended. Bishop gave notice of its intent to depose Braden and Braden responded on July 31, 2002, with a motion to stay the civil proceedings, listing the following grounds:

"2. Among the claims…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Wilma Corp. v. Fleming Foods of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte AntonucciSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Limestone County Department of Human Resources v. S.B.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  3. Ivey v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  4. Southern Health Systems, Inc. v. AntonucciSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API