Brady v. Admiralty Trading Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered September 28, 1914, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
This is an action to recover a commission on a sale of canned salmon. The plaintiff is a salmon broker. The defendant is a salmon packer. The cause was tried to the court without a jury. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for $386.60, with interest and costs. Defendant appeals.
The cause is here for a trial de novo. Since we cannot agree with the conclusion reached by the trial court, we shall, following our usual custom, discuss the evidence. It is not *478voluminous, and we therefore set it out almost in its entirety as it appears in the abstract, which we have verified by a careful…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Zeimer v. AntisellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Hicks v. PostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Brown v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Ropes v. John Rosenfeld's SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Fultz v. WimerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wallace v. McKennaIdaho Supreme Court · 1918