Legal Opinion
State v. Spitsyn
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 3, 2002No. 01-143PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Surety Marble Valley Bail Bonds, Ltd. appeals from an order of the Rutland District Court forfeiting bail following defendant’s nonappearance for a status conference preceding his sentencing hearing. We affirm.
The relevant facts are taken from the docketing statement and are not in dispute. On August 17, 2000, Dmitri Spitsyn was arraigned in Rutland District Court on one count of negligent operation of a vehicle, in violation of 23 V.S. A § 1091(b). The court imposed conditions of release, and surety posted $3,000 bail. On October 31, 2000, the parties informed the court that defendant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Isbrandtsen v. North Branch Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Morrisseau v. FayetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- United States v. Thomas Miller, Resolute Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Fairchild Square Co. v. Green Mountain Bagel Bakery, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Jackson v. RogersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Towslee v. CallananSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- State v. TavisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Peterson v. Binnacle Capital Servs. LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Feldberg v. Quechee Lakes Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Peterson v. Binnacle Capital Services LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019