Legal Opinion

Pfister v. Iowa District Court for Polk County

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 10, 2004No. 02-1513PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

In the 2002 legislative session, the Iowa General Assembly adopted several amendments to the Iowa Code addressing the appointment of state-paid counsel for indigent persons alleged to have violated parole. In the matter before us, the district court ruled the amendments were unconstitutional to the extent they denied court-appointed counsel to indigent parolees who would otherwise be entitled to such counsel under the principles set forth in Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973). The court concluded, however, that the amendments eliminating…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. In Re the Detention of GarrenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Gacke v. Pork Xtra, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  5. McNabb v. OsmundsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  2. Edward Crowell v. State Public Defender v. Iowa District Court for Linn CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  3. Alons v. Iowa District Court for Woodbury CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. Rhiner v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  5. State v. DeckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API